Writing project 3
Religious
studies what is that. Religious studies are defined as a program that engages in the comparative,
cross-cultural study of religions and cultures. It also focuses on various
disciplinary approaches, including the historical, sociological,
anthropological and theological, the academic study of religion seeks to
interpret, analyze and evaluate the nature and role of religion in the lives of
individuals and societies. One could break this program down into several
parts. First being religions. Second being cultures. The third being the
disciplinary approaches.
For the disciplinary approaches, I would define it
as a concentrated area of interest. But scholars define it as the development
of studies, theories, and process. In one article I read it focuses on the
psychological and thought process of things also referred to as knowledge. Titled; “Knowledge
essentially based upon false beliefs”. It is written by Avram Hiller. The
beginning part of the article is based mostly on an agent an agent is a person
who acts on behalf of another. Where he makes statements like knowledge is that the agent’s belief is not
essentially based on any false assumptions. Then he calls theses false
assumptions the nonessential-false-assumption account, or NEFA. Throughout the
article he refers to NEFA a lot. He uses examples from other philosophers and
shows how NEFA can refer to their situation. He then describes how everything
has justification to it. He shows what this agent person (his secretary) uses
as claims for justification. He says the reason why the agent has knowledge
despite the causal role that the falsehood plays is that there is another
proposition – the proposition that the secretary said that the appointment is
on Monday – which meets three conditions: (1) it is also justified by the
apparent memory (2) it is true, and (3) it justifies the belief. Because there
is available to the agent a second proposition that meets these conditions even
if the agent doesn’t explicitly believe the proposition. He then goes to say
even if the person doesn’t believe these things it has to be true due to logic
and the use of logos. And not everything can be proven using NEFA. After a long
rant of useful information he sums up everything in a few sentences which comes
down to: there is a plausible alternative account of knowledge which handles
the cases appropriately and which thus demands further examination. “Here
is where I would insert my interview findings”.
This is just the rough draft. I would continue
this process for the two other parts of the discipline and I feel this should
put me on the right track.